![]() The possibility of achieving "zero net emissions" each year makes the evolution of actual greenhouse gas emissions over time invisible, which does not encourage the organization to implement effective actions to reduce emissions at source.In general, there are other limitations in defining carbon neutrality as a static and individual state at an organizational level, including: Finally, there is one sole label being used, "carbon neutral", which is used for private initiatives which have very different ambitions this leads to counterproductive leveling-down. Finally, the very idea of " offsetting" is based on physically questionable principles (for example, the equivalence postulate between a reduction at the source and the purchase of carbon credits or between certain and immediate emissions, and presumed and – in some cases – future reductions/removals, etc.) and induces a psychological bias on the part of the credit buyers (the belief in the possibility of "cancelling out" the climate problem at a little cost, etc.). ![]() Secondly, the ambition of the targeted reduction is rarely compatible with the 3% to 7% per year reduction in global emissions required to comply with the Paris Agreement. First of all, the scope of the emissions taken into account may overlook the most significant emissions’ sources in which the company's activities depend on. Within this framework, "carbon neutrality" can be achieved each year, by immediately "cancelling out" (or "offsetting") an organization’s emissions through the purchase of "carbon credits".īut this reasoning suffers from many limitations, both theoretical and practical. Today's demands for neutrality in the corporate world are essentially based on a process of three theoretical steps: " Measure, Reduce and Offset". "Companies' carbon neutrality": the big blur Carbon neutrality is a breakthrough concept. In view of the effort required, both in terms of reducing emissions and increasing the removals, achieving global carbon neutrality will necessarily have to go hand in hand with profound and radical socio-technical transformations. the increase in sinks - Afforestation/reforestation, agricultural practices and technological solutions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |